ITC Limited Gurgaon Vs. Commr.Of I.T(TDS) Delhi, on 26th April, 2016; Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
‘Tips’ paid to the employees in Hotels, cannot be taken section 15 (b) of the Income- Tax Act for tax […]
Tag: Latest Supreme Court Judgement 2016
-
-
Amal Kumar Jha Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Anr, on 26th April, 2016; Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
When act of accused connection directly and reasonably with his official duty, Sanction U/s- 197 of CrPC required for his […]
-
Modern Dental College & Res.Cen. & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors, on 2 May, 2016, Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
Private Medical or Dental Colleges having fundamental rights to carry on their ‘occupation’ but subject to Law and Rules enacted […]
-
Supreme Court asks reopening of Amitabh Bachchan’s 2001 Tax Case in connection with his income from KBC
New Delhi: Today, on Wednesday, 11th May, the honourable Supreme Court of India allowed the Income- Tax department to re- […]
-
VLS Finacne Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr, On 28th April, 2016, Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
Apex Court considered computation of limitation under section 158BE(2) of IT Act from final search date, as assessee never challenged […]
-
Ashok Kumar Giri Vs. Govt. Of India and Ors, on 27th April, 2016, Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
Court should consider the legal position that 3% reservation for Disabled Persons must be computed based on cadre strength, not […]
-
Common Cause Vs. Union Of India & Ors, on 4th April, 2016, Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
Mining leasehold period: Extension of the benefits under MMDR Act, in favour of leaseholders Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of […]
-
Joint Secreatary, Political Department Govt. of Meghalaya Main Secretariat Shill Vs. High Court of Meghalaya Thru Its Registrar, Shillong; on 18th March, 2016, Supreme Court of India: Case Brief – Read Judgement
Testing law without a challenge against its constitutional validity, could be wrong as held by Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. […]